LCHT Blog

Demand Reduction: Beginning a Dialogue

Tuesday, April 05, 2011


Meagan Morris
Demand Reduction Roundtable Conference Coordinator
Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking


Colorado’s ongoing efforts to better understand human trafficking in our communities has received a lot of momentum in the past year and LCHT is jumping in the conversation with both feet. We recently announced that more information would be forthcoming on two of LCHT’s primary 2011 projects: the Colorado Project to Comprehensively Combat Human Trafficking and a new initiative on demand reduction. This blog kicks off our 2011 Demand Reduction Roundtable project.

I have joined the LCHT team to coordinate the Demand Reduction Roundtable. I came to the issue of human trafficking during my undergraduate studies. As a student in the political science department, I found myself in a course addressing human trafficking taught by the co-founders of LCHT. Following the course, I completed an internship with LCHT and have become wholly dedicated to the issue.

People talk about the stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance. I think there can be an analogous model as it relates to a person’s experience learning about human trafficking. For me it was: outrage, sadness, helplessness, the do-something-no-matter-what-it-is feeling, and finally a feeling that it is possible to address human trafficking through collaborative, concerted efforts. It is from this place that I come to the discussion surrounding demand reduction. It is my hope that this blog serves as a forum for the anti-trafficking community and the general public to begin to engage in a discussion about how to carefully and meaningfully apply demand reduction strategies as a component of an holistic approach to combat human trafficking in Colorado.

Whether you are looking to media coverage, policy trends, or scholarly works, people are talking about the role of demand in perpetuating human trafficking. Colorado - a state facing incidences of labor and sex trafficking as well as a major transit point for trafficking - is constantly being pushed to better refine our anti-trafficking strategies. Following the national trend, our state has begun to explore how to best approach demand reduction initiatives. Such efforts around the country have included public awareness campaigns; prevention education; “john schools” (diversion programs to dissuade first time buyers or solicitors of commercial sex similar to the proposed SB 11-085); boycotts of businesses known to exploit workers; among many others.

It is not enough to know what efforts are out there. We have to begin to ask, what are the demonstrated outcomes in reducing trafficking?

LCHT’s goal for the Fall 2011 Demand Reduction Roundtable is to create a space for critical dialogue around effective demand reduction strategies for human trafficking in Colorado. LCHT plays a unique role in the process, as we are not direct service providers, law enforcement, nor policy makers, but we are educators and community organizers. At the present moment, while there is demand for both labor and sex trafficking, current momentum for 2011 points toward a greater will to discuss sex trafficking. This is our starting point.

In the ongoing weeks, we invite you to read, comment, discuss and engage on this topic. And with that I will leave you to ponder!

Comments
Brandi Stanley commented on 05-Apr-2011 09:52 AM
I'm personally really excited to see what comes of this blog. Reducing demand is an extremely complicated subject, and I know it'll produce a lot of really great conversation. Thanks for starting it out, Meg!
Kristianna commented on 07-Apr-2011 09:45 AM
Meagan, thank you for starting this dialogue! I think it's an important conversation to have and I appreciate how you outlined it so clearly.

carol fenton commented on 22-Aug-2011 09:12 AM
I don't know of any "end the demand" statistics that prove it is an effective strategy, and yet there is a large push towards this effort from the G/TIP office, CSEC providers and many feminists. If you have anything that suggests that this is something
that is worth putting time and money into w/o the possibility of harming trafficked persons, please let me know. ~ Carol
carol fenton commented on 22-Nov-2011 03:13 PM
The "end the demand" programs are generally a range of efforts that include a diversion school ("John's school), which requires increased police efforts or stings - which often occur in poor neighborhoods. This shaming tactic is only enforcing anti-prostitution
laws - not trafficking legislation - and rarely identifies youth under 18, but when these stings occur, many women over 18 are arrested. Furthermore, end demand programs rely on shaming and fear tactics that ultimately endanger people in the sex industry.
There is also conflict of interest between police and service providers because of funding - which can ultimately lead to corruption in an already volatile situation. You may already be aware, or are experiencing this in the Denver area. The "end the demand"
programs do not rely on any scientific data or BKM's, and are not anything close to what could be considered part of a health care or harm reduction approach, which is why I'm surprised that dv care providers and feminists are supporting it, and in these difficult
economic times I cannot imagine any city putting a single dollar into this program when there are people sleeping and going hungry in the streets. It just doesn't make sense.
devis mutuelle commented on 19-Jan-2012 10:37 AM
Je suis plutot d'accord avec vous c'est une bonne chose

Post a Comment




Captcha Image